Detailed Results |
Order Transaction Mix |
Count |
Tx. Mix |
New Order |
1,343,788 |
50.00% |
Change Order |
536,896 |
19.98% |
Order Status |
537,388 |
20.00% |
Customer Status |
269,489 |
10.03% |
Total # Order Transactions |
2,687,561 |
|
|
Total # Manufacturing Transactions |
1,948,042 |
|
|
Response Times |
Average |
Maximum |
90th% |
Reqd |
New Order |
0.43 |
20.46 |
1.10 |
2.00 |
Change Order |
0.20 |
5.82 |
0.40 |
2.00 |
Order Status |
0.09 |
4.80 |
0.20 |
2.00 |
Customer Status |
0.10 |
21.48 |
0.30 |
2.00 |
Manufacturing |
3.29 |
24.50 |
4.75 |
5.00 |
|
|
Reproducibility Run (TOPS) |
2,576.35 |
|
|
Benchmark Configuration Information |
Persistence Mode Used:
All beans were deployed using Container Managed Persistence (CMP).
|
Isolation Requirement Info:
The following beans CustomerEnt, RuleEnt and DiscountEnt in the Corporate Domain,
OrderCustomerEnt and ItemEnt in the Customer Domain,
PartEnt, ComponentEnt, AssemblyEnt, BomEnt and LargeOrderEnt in the Manufacturing Domain and
SupplierCompEnt and SupplierEnt in the Supplier Domain were accessed using READ_COMMITTED which
is Cursor Stability (CS) for DB2 and the remaining beans were accessed using REPEATABLE_READ which
translates to DB2 isolation level of Read Stability (RS).
|
Durability Requirement Info:
To ensure database durability, RAID-5E (utilizing block-level stripping and
distributed parity) was used for the database logs maintained on the
EXP300 Storage Expansion Unit.
|
Storage Requirement Info:
Over the course of a 45 minute run at an injection rate of 1500, database storage
increased 997.6 MB. Given a linear scale, an eight hour run at the same injection
rate would increase storage 10641.54 MB. The FAStT 200 Storage Server was configured
with two RAID-5E logical volumes consisting of 5 (36.4GB) disks each. These two
volumes were merged into a single file system using LVM stripping that yielded
102400.00 MB of total disk storage for the database.
|
Argument Passing Semantics:
WebSphere 5.1 Application Server uses pass-by-value semantics by default.
|
For questions about this result, please contact the submitter: IBM Corporation
For other inquiries, please contact
webmaster@spec.org
Benchmark run on Sat Nov 08 17:09:52 EST 2003 by SPECjAppServer2002 v1.14
Result submitted on Wed Nov 12 03:03:00 EST 2003
Report generated by SPECjAppServer2002 Reporter v1.01
Copyright © 2002 Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation
First published at SPEC.org on 26-Nov-2003